So, in my case, while my clock speed with the 2017 system was faster, the i5 does not process data as efficiently as the older i7. They also don’t require an engineering degree to understand.
#FINAL CUT PRO PC PC#
Thus, a total of eight threads can run on them at the same time.” ( PC Magazine)īoth these PC Magazine articles are excellent and worth reading. Not only are they quad cores, they also support Hyper-Threading. “This is one of the many reasons why Core i7 processors are the creme de la creme. Currently, all Core i3s are dual-core processors.” “they don’t support Hyper-Threading a single core to serve multiple threads. The lowest number of cores can be found in Core i3 CPUs, i.e., which have only two cores. “The more cores there are, the more tasks (known as threads) can be served at the same time. On currently available desktop processors, most i5 CPUs have up to 9MB of 元 cache, while most i7 processors have up to 12MB.” ( PC Magazine) Larger cache sizes help with multitasking as well, since background tasks will be ready for when you switch focus to another window. “In addition to generally faster base clock speeds, Core i7 processors have larger cache (on-board memory) to help the processor deal with repetitive tasks faster…. “For the most part, the more cores you have in your CPU, the faster it will perform. Core i7 processors are certainly aimed at people who complain that their current system is “too slow.” They will be better for multitasking, multimedia tasks, high-end gaming, and scientific work. Essentially, the Core i7 processors have more capabilities than Core i5 CPUs. “Simply put, Core i5-equipped systems are less expensive than Core i7-equipped PCs…. PC Magazine has two excellent articles comparing the two CPUs:
And, second, the newer system only has 8 GB of RAM. There are two big issues here: first, the processor takes a step back with an i5. The new version should feel “faster,” shouldn’t it. NOTE: From a GPU point of view, I moved from NVIDIA to a pretty high-performance Radeon 580. So, in this tutorial, I want to look more specifically at the CPU, RAM and Libraries in FCP X. Well, the only real answer is: “Everything.” But, ah, that’s not particularly helpful. This got me thinking: “What affects performance during editing?” Some Motion templates on this webpage are available from, I migrated my main editing studio from a 2013 27″ iMac to a 2017 27″ iMac – only to discover that my editing performance in Final Cut slowed down.Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio and iMac. Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a complex 5-minute project with 8K ProRes 422 media. Testing conducted by Apple in February 2022 using preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 128GB of RAM, and 8TB SSD, as well as production 3.6GHz 10-core Intel Core i9-based 27-inch iMac systems with Radeon Pro 5700 XT graphics with 16GB of GDDR6, 128GB of RAM, and 8TB SSD.Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a 5-minute project with 4K Apple ProRes 4444 media, at 3840x2160 resolution and 23.98 frames per second, transcoded to Apple ProRes 422. Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio. Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a 1-minute picture-in-picture project with 18 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 8192x4320 resolution and 30 frames per second, as well as a 1-minute picture-in-picture project with 56 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 3840x2160 resolution and 29.97 frames per second. Testing conducted by Apple in February 2022 using preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 128GB of RAM, and 8TB SSD.macOS Ventura or later is required to edit Cinematic mode video captured on devices with iOS 16 or later. macOS Monterey or later is required to edit Cinematic mode video on devices with iOS 15.
0 kommentar(er)
